BigSkyMan

February 2018

BigSkyMan, your present account seems to have come from nowhere to take part in disputes at Skowronek (horse). If you have another account, you should create a user page and give details of it. I reverted your last edit to the page, because deleting another user's carefully researched citations is not a rational way to conduct a content dispute. Moonraker (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

I was reverting VERY obvious disruption. See Mendaliv’s tp for another example. BigSkyMan (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

But that is not dealing with my point at all. Have you arrived in the dispute by chance, or are you one of the users who has already been part of it? Moonraker (talk) 18:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Stop trying to out me. BigSkyMan (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

By saying that, you seem to be agreeing that you are operating two accounts in an unacceptable way. Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Moonraker (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

I am not sock puppetrying. BigSkyMan (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Skwornek (horse)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 27 February 2018.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)