Big49erfan
December 2011
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kiryat Arba appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. nableezy - 22:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 22:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
It is no less neutral than the content that existed before. Big49erfan
- That isnt true. You replaced well sourced material with such phrases as anti-semetic groups such as the International Court of Justice .... Please read WP:NPOV and WP:RS. nableezy - 22:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kiryat Arba with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 22:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I am not sure why somebody would consider it vandalism to add that a murder was committed by Arab terrorists. That is a simple fact.
- Why? Probably because the description of terrorist is a subjective one that is rarely applied consistently. nableezy - 22:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Also, all articles in the Arab-Israeli topic area are subject to a 1 revert rule. A revert is any edit that reverses another edit, in whole or in part. You can read about this here. If you violate this rule you may be blocked from editing. nableezy - 22:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I find it hard to believe that the description of a "terrorist" is subjective. I guess that you are essentially saying that murder of a pregnant woman, teenage girl or other innocent individuals is justifiable if it was in was to terrorize people that you do not like. Furthermore, I will also add that your quick response to an edit on the Kiriyat Arba page within 5 minutes of the edit is telling of how you monitor the page so as to ensure that only your point of view is heard. I also dispute the neutrality of the term "international community". The international community does not fail to recognize Israel's right to Kiriyat Arba, but rather certain elements of the international community do.