Dear Sir/Madam,

It seems that you are intentionally hurting the sentiments of kushwaha community. There is no base to keep kushwaha community in "Sudra Varna".

For example "Classification of The Yadavs are included in the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) category in the Indian states of Bihar,[42] Chhattisgarh,[43] Delhi,[44] Haryana,[45] Jharkhand,[46] Karnataka,[47] Madhya Pradesh,[48] Odisha,[49] Rajasthan,[50] Uttar Pradesh,[51] and West Bengal.[52] In the state of Uttar Pradesh the Social Justice Committee reported over representation of Upper OBCs, specially the Yadavs in public offices and suggested creating sub categories within the OBC category[53] and the Yadav/Ahir are the only group listed in Part A of a three-part OBC classification system introduced there following the official report of 2001.[54]

Pagelink:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yadav#Classification

Then why are you not doing the same for kushwaha community. One more Example i can give you "The majority of Mauritians declare themselves Vaish rather than Koiri or Kurmi".

My Suggestion: If there is conflict of opinion then kindly remove the classification section from the article. There is no need to give classification "kshatriya, vaishya or shudra" which will hurt sentiments of cores of kushwaha community. No one is sure which classification is accurate. When there is dought its better to remove that thing.

Regards, Amrit Raj

Start a discussion with Bharatiya samman

Start a discussion