Welcome

edit
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Falcon8765 (TALK) 03:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sources should be for ideas and information, not verbatim text

edit

  Your addition to B.J. Nikkel has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

In a situation like this, it is usually the wrong approach to take to copy newspaper articles word-for-word. Instead, the articles should be used as a source for information. A description of the situation can then be written in original text, citing the newspaper story as a reference. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Do not copy the text wholesale from the Denver Post website! Quoting the bottom of the article: "All contents Copyright 2010 The Denver Post or other copyright holders. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed for any commercial purpose." Those license terms preclude use of the text on Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 03:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Additionally, please note that I have started discussion at Talk:B.J. Nikkel about whether to include the information in the article. Please join in the discussion about the situation there and explain why the suits should be mentioned in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not re-add the copyright material to the article on B.J. Nikkel. You are in danger of being blocked for this. Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to B.J. Nikkel has been reverted. You claim that the Denver Post has provided written authorization for reuse—including commercial reuse—of the text. Please explain the nature of this permission before you re-add the text; otherwise, you will be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 01:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continuing to add content that violates Wikipedia's policy on copytights.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 01:59, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's copyright policy can be found at WP:COPYVIO. It is strictly enforced. If you resume this disallowed practice when your block expires you can expect blocks for longer periods. I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tiderolls 02:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: your post on my user talk

edit

I want to thank you for taking the time to message me. There was no need to blank your message, discussion is the method we use to find consensus for the content that is included in this encyclopedia. I also want to convey that my block of your account was not meant to communicate that you are not welcome to edit here. When users continue to execute edits after they have been advised to cease, it is disruptive to our processes. Your message convinces me that you understand the seriousness of this situation. I only wish that you had stopped to discuss the situation before your block. There were numerous warnings that contained links to the policies that directly applied to the content you wanted to include. If you have read the policies that relate to copyrights and are still unsure of their application, you can message editors that monitor the copyvio discussion page by clicking here: Wikipedia talk:Copyright violations. If you cannot find satisfactory answers there, let me know and I will direct you to editors that are very knowledgable regarding copyvios. While outside parties may be well intentioned, the editors on Wikipedia are your best source for help and advice on matters relating to policy and editing guidelines. I hope that you continue to edit here; we are grateful for any help we receive. Regards Tiderolls 06:06, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply