August 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to CrossFit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Master of Pies (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to CrossFit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  13:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to CrossFit. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Master of Pies (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your Edot

edit

Don't include it. Does not adhere to nPOV policy and constitutes to vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Master of Pies (talkcontribs)


RE: Sense when is the truth vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berry34 (talkcontribs)

After reading through your edits, they do violate the policy on biographies on living persons. Your edits are contentious and unsourced. They also appear to be original reseach. Please read the two links to understand why your edits do not belong. Jons63 (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Re: Sorry that was my mistake. So for example I will have to post the court documents on here about Mr. Glassman and his crossfit company. And let me get this correct I can't use Mr. Glassman? I can only use his company.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berry34 (talkcontribs)

You can mention Mr. Glassman, as long as you have reliable sources that substantiate any claims you make. It also can't give undue weight to the negative information. If the court documents say he is accused of something then it does not belong at all. The court documents must say he did the things you put in because he is innocent until proven guilty. Jons63 (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Re:

Ok that is completely my fault. I am new to this and very upset about this, who says they are going to harm someones family over a domain name really? What is considered to be a reliable news source? Or a reliable source? and do I just post a link below? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berry34 (talkcontribs)

Click on this link It explains all about reliable sources Jons63 (talk) 14:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply