Befreechinesee

Improving Wikipedia articles

While Neutral Point of View in articles is a key Wikipedia policy, "Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages."

You have noted your concerns on Talk:Boxer Rebellion. The talk page is a place to discuss improving the article. You are welcome to make suggestions for improvements to the article, based on reliable sources.

— ERcheck (talk) 16:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I just want to analyze and ilustrate the deep reasons of Chinese Boxer Anti-invasion Movement and the conflicts between Christian missionaries and Chinese. And the analysis is valuable to the article and needs to be added to the content of the article and thus will help to impove the article. -Befreechinesee (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Personal opinion and original research are not to be added to the article. Information from reliable sources is appreciated. Please make specific suggestions on the talk page. — ERcheck (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok. I just read the article at a glance. After careful reading I'll go to more specific points. -Befreechinesee (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Also, please read all of the discussion on the talk page. There have been a series of discussion on neutrality of the article, etc., with the goal of improving the quality of the article. — ERcheck (talk) 18:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) As you are new to Wikipedia, I provide the following suggestions to you:

Take a look at the information on the following pages. They can be a help in navigating Wikipedia and understanding the policies and guidelines.

• Wikipedia:Welcome
• Wikipedia:Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• Manual of Style

— ERcheck (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Befreechinesee: the goal is encyclopedic neutrality, casting one side as "spiritual slaveries of a bastardy" and such phrases does not help collaborative editing one bit. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok. But it's a fact in Jewish history record and is highly possible that Jesus, the mental slave owner of Christinity, was a bastardy of Joseph ben Pantera. The key point is not about the bastardy, it's about what and who brought conflicts. -Befreechinesee (talk) 04:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)