Bblblstr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do not understand why I have been blocked from contributing to Wikipedia. I am not "User:Jw9." I made three well-documented and sourced factual additions to the Wikipedia page for the University of Canterbury. Not only were my additions reversed almost immediately, but I have been accused of "abusing multiple accounts," which I have not done. I would like to be unblocked or at the very least to receive an explanation regarding why I have been accused of wrongdoing.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bblblstr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can I at least be informed of what evidence you have for accusing me of "sockpuppetry"? Or does your mere assertion here obviate the need for actual evidence? Bblblstr (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even apart from the checkuser data, to which I have no access, quack testing is convincing. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.