Barrasita
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Buddhism and violence, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sangam.org/articles/view/?id=118.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Will alter it.Barrasita (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
September 2010 edit
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Islam and violence. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 04:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Please don't rush to push a POV in removing and vandalizing a page, it's all sourced, nothing is POV or self "commentary". That you so claim.Barrasita (talk) 04:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)