This was a really interesting article to read. I found out information that I never really understood. I like how the Article flowed; it was not “all over the place”. If you guys didn’t work well together, I couldn’t even tell. There are a lot of references which is good—it shows that this topic was well researched. I had to give a 0 for the illustrations, but I don’t know what you could have put up there, that is the only “bad” thing I can think of. Again, you guys did well.Dlaster (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)