Aydan B-va

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for shown Help pages that I can use in future to report other disruptive users. But note that I make edits and cite proper sources, whereas the ones who revert my edits actually do not provide any source. For the worst end, they delete my sources as well. Next time, be attentive with regard to changes and what you consider as "unconsturctive". Aydan B-va (talk)

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes, tell me why my replies in talk pages are deleted. Is that because they reveal true info not beneficial for some groups here? I see fake and ridiculous statements which keep staying in talk pages on the other hand. Refrain from discriminating! Aydan B-va (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Zəngilan, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 11:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

And I suggest you to familiarize yourself with the latest news :) Soon or later, you will revert it to my writing anyways. You were doing it for other cities as well :) Aydan B-va (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

When and if a change in control is confirmed - that's another issue. With regard to WP:NPOV, neutral and reliable sources needs to be utilized for the content of Wikipedia articles. AntonSamuel (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zəngilan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

It is you that disrupt Wikipedia. Zangilan is not in Nagorno Karabakh. It is purely Azerbaijani territory that does not have autonomy possibility either. Just because armenians gave some fake name when they OCCUPIED it, it does not mean its name should be like that. Imagine giving some Armenian name to Los Angeles just because armenians live there. Educate yourself first! Aydan B-va (talk) 18:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

And also I saw what happened after your first warning. My writing was restored. Refrain from disrupting my talk page as well! Aydan B-va (talk) 18:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

I've reverted your removal of the Armenian name again, and I've explained the reason for its inclusion on the Zəngilan talk page [1]. I would advise you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Core content policies, especially WP:NPOV further. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Lachin

There has been no confirmation on the town's handover, only the surrounding district, please take part in the discussion on the talk page and substantiate your claims before changing the page again: [2] AntonSamuel (talk) 12:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

I have took part and explained. The city is and will be in Azerbaijan whether you like it or not:) Aydan B-va (talk) 12:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lachin, you may be blocked from editing. AntonSamuel (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 11:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

The same applies to you. I have seen many times after HistoryofIran runs out of editing, you step there. You can be blocked too. Now, focus on bringing logical arguments in talk pages. Aydan B-va (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

If you think that you have proof that me and LouisAragon are collaborating and for the worse of Wikipedia a that, why don't you just file a case :P? Or are these just baseless accusations? (WP:ASPERSIONS) --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Well, you coming here already proves it. Unlike you, I don’t want to block people in Wikipedia, I’d like to waste my time on more important stuff and I don’t vandalize talk pages of other users. Just focus on bringing logical arguments on talk pages of articles. I’m still waiting for argument or 3rd party opinion call. Aydan B-va (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

How does that prove it? Please explain. Also, if you keep attacking me with these baseless accussations I will have to report you since I apparently like to have people blocked. Srsly, treat others how you want to treated, no need to be hostile. You certainly wont get your way with this current conduct, whether youre in the right or wrong. If you dont want me here, then maybe dont cast aspersions against me here? HistoryofIran (talk)

Does Wikipedia have a policy on users who ignore comments on talk pages of the articles like Nakhchivan Khanate? Maybe you start on that? Aydan B-va (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I’m not going waster my time for proving your collaboration. If I did, I’d just report you. I did not tag you, and u know better if you collaborate or not! I’m not going to comment about that anymore. I’m waiting for a response and logical arguments for Nakhchivan khanate. Aydan B-va (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

So, you have no proof, gotcha. Not tagging me whilst talking behind my back makes it even worse. HistoryofIran (talk)

• The first time I edited the Nakchivan Khanate article was in 2014, many years before User:HistoryofIran ever sat foot on it. Considering you've been involved with both me and him on the Nakchivan Khanate article, its perfectly expectable that he may visit your talk page. Let me phrase it this way. You've racked up quite a few WP:TENDENTIOUS edits in your time on Wikipedia. The Nakchivan case is just a new addition. These are just some once can find through a cursory glance.[3]-[4]-[5]-[6] If you continue with this editorial pattern, I will report you personally. Trust me, this won't look good at WP:ANI or WP:AA2. Please take your time to get more familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 15:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Well, from my editings - Kapan case and March Genocide are actually right ones. Karabakh khanate was ruled by Turks as it is written in the page and in the article, March Genocide is also mentioned. The former ones I did when I was new to Wikipedia. No, I don’t think he was following my talk page. He appeared when I expressed my concern on your collaboration. Maybe, you have been accused of the similar collaboration before. Anyways, I will not talk about that if you don’t continuously intrude with my editings and vandalize my talk page. Aydan B-va (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Aydan B-va, please, prefer using more of a civil tone, and don't fight fire with fire. Accusing other editors of off-wiki coordination and meatpuppetry is a serious thing and you need an evidence of that. Furthermore, there is no such thing as "running out of edits." The editors at conflict shall reach a consensus (and if stuck in a deadlock, shall refer to dispute resolution), and then publish the agreed edit. The article isn't running away, the consensus can be reached at any time. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 02:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, yes, making changes to pages is possible after talking on the page. That’s basically what you said. So do the same. Talk before changing articles. Aydan B-va (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)