Atticusshafferfanclub

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Atticus Shaffer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Atticus Shaffer was changed by Atticusshafferfanclub (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92885 on 2014-12-09T04:21:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Atticus Shaffer, you may be blocked from editing. SeoMac (talk) 05:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nthep (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atticusshafferfanclub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

One of my friend's has been trolling using my acccount! Atticusshafferfanclub (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

An account which has been used only for vandalism needs to be blocked. At a rough guess, I would say that about 98% of blocked editors who request an unblock claiming that someone else did the vandalism using their account are lying. When that happens, it is yet more reason to keep them blocked, as it makes no sense to unblock someone we know can't be trusted. If, on the other hand, you are one of the (say) 2% who really have been subject to someone else abusing their account, then your account is compromised, and must remain blocked to prevent further abuse by the person who compromised it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Atticusshafferfanclub. Avono (talk) 21:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)