Per Appelgren~enwiki
RE proven links edit
Obviously you and I disagree. I don't live in Sweden or Virginia, but I am fascinated by the war of accusations between LaRouche and his enemies. It's never about LaRouche's ideas, which are complicated in some ways but in other ways simple: he is for the Franklin Roosevelt approach, and against globalization and free trade. But do his enemies like Chip Berlet and Dennis King ever just simply say that they think globalization is better? No, they say that the Roosevelt approach is fascist. Do they believe it? I don't think so. They won't engage in a straightforward debate. Does anybody actually think the LaRouche group was involved in the Palme killing? Do you? I doubt it.
But the thing which really intrigues me is, why go to all the trouble? Is the LaRouche group that powerful or influential? But it is clear to me that the US government, plus private interests, spent literally hundreds of millions of dollars to try to finish off LaRouche. And if that thing about Herbert Brehmer is on the level, the East Bloc went to some trouble to get rid of him also. What makes this guy so important to them? I'd like to be able to figure it out. --ManEatingDonut 23:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
pedigrees edit
You may wish to check the several genealogical trees mentioned at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek pedigree of Empress Sisi. Maed 03:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Response from Marvin Diode edit
I feel somewhat insulted by your message on my talk page. Your claim is incorrect; I have participated in a variety of different articles, generally ones that appear on the RFC pages for politics. In the article you reference, I have no objection to "furious hate campaigns" if it is quotes, and properly cited. If it appears as an uncited editorial comment in the article, it is inappropriate, regardless of what the topic of the article is. --Marvin Diode 22:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Ambassador to the Soviet Union redirect edit
Many countries have Ambassadors to the Soviet Union. I was searching in the Stafford Cripps article and came up a cropper-here that is. There may be more articles containing Ambassador to the Soviet Union that refer to an Ambassador of the United States to Russia so it is convenient as an editors shorthand, but it leaves out the rest of cases and makes Wikipedia more Americo-centric than it needs to be-I propose that it should redirect to a page of the various Ambassadors to the Soviet Union, a disambiguation page.--DadaNeem (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
btw I posted the above on Talk:Ambassador to the Soviet Union
Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas L. Siebert edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Thomas L. Siebert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomaslsiebert. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed edit
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Per Appelgren. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Per Appelgren~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
02:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed edit
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
17:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)