AssistantX

spiff

Yeah I already fixed it, sorry about that. (There's too many messages scrolling through the CVU bot notices) Kevin Breitenstein 05:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

69.169.91.81

Thanks for leaving the test1 notice on the 69.169.91.81's talk page, but as they reverted their edits themself, I felt a {{selftest}} would be more appropriate, so I replaced your warning with that. I hope you don't mind. Thanks. Cowman109^Talk 22:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Pepper Ann

Why did you revert the characters section?

Accusation of vandalism

Dear AssistantX, I recieved a message from you saying that I had vandalized a section in the Joel and Ethan Coen page. I understand why you felt like someone had vandalized the quote on the page, but I was actually correcting it and was making it more accurate as to how it is in the movie and in the original screenplay, I wasn't trying to be rude or funny and I am most certainly not the type of person that goes around this web-site vandalizing articles.

Thanks,

--66.217.39.194 23:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

While 66.217.39.194 placed his edit in the wrong place in the sentence, it was a true correction of the quote directly from the movie. I have replaced the edit back into the Joel and Ethan Coen page (in the correct location in the sentence). ju66l3r 23:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Falls Church High School

Hi, thanks for reverting the nonsense and vandalism on the article Falls Church High School. Bye --Starionwolf 01:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Huh?

Haven't touched the Christgau page. Thanks for reverting, but I'm just a number.

The number is your IP address. Your IP address could be shared among others so if it was not you who edited the page, it could have been another user. To avoid this, you should sign up for an account. AssistantX 06:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

194.109.194.33

Ty for the pointers, not sure if you meant to say anything else then give me the advice to register (which I really should do :o) ). Cheers! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.109.194.33 (talk) 02:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)