I will like inform all Wikipedia users that some of the people writing in this pages are misinform about History and Archeology and are writing historical nonsense. If you fill the need to write nonsense find another page to do that, let the expert write historical facts.

your problems with the vinland article

edit

Hi there, I've noticed you've been editing the vinland article, and it's evident that you don't agree with its content. That is of course acceptable, but making large unsubstantiated changes or deletions to the article is not. If you disagree with the content, and you have academic sources (or widespread non-academic beliefs) to back up your own assertions, then let's add that position to the article. If you do not have sources for your own positions, then you should not be adding your beliefs to Wikipedia. Even if they are true, Wikipedia has a "no original research" policy. Note that removing existing content should be done very carefully: the article tries to reflect established knowledge, beliefs and theories about Vinland. Perhaps you are right and it's all wrong, but that doesn't mean it can be taken out of the article. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No_Original_Research for more information on these policies. Thanks! Martijn Faassen (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply