Armyoptimist

February 2011

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Muhammad. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored, and you have no right to attempt to impose your own view on Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Please review the policies and guidelines

I have to say, you are coming very close to being blocked indefinitely. Most of your edits are being reverted as disruptive. Please review the following:

• Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (that is don't impose your views in articles)
• Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources (sources must be verifiable and reliable, not blogs)
• Wikipedia:No original research (don't derive conclusions that aren't stated in reliable sources)
• You should also review Talk:Muhammad/FAQ, because you posted an argument on Talk:Muhammad that has been posted hundreds of times before you.

Also, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox if you want to experiment with edits, or create a page in your own userspace such as User:Armyoptimist/test for experimentation. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pakistan Army, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pakistan Army was changed by Armyoptimist (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944755 on 2011-02-20T09:27:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)