Arci-84
AfD nomination of Vernes Kunovac
edit
Vernes Kunovac, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Vernes Kunovac satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernes Kunovac and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Vernes Kunovac during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Duja► 08:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Arci, would you please read our policy Wikipedia:Notability (people), especially the "athletes" part under WP:BIO#Additional_criteria? Basically, we don't accept articles about everything and everybody: we require an already existing substantial coverage in reliable sources. Basically, we won't accept the articles on 3rd and 4th league players (unless they have done something extraordinarily). The one on Edin Cakovic will likely pass, as he signed for IFK Malmö, but the one on Izet Kaljic likely won't. Even if he is a "hot name", you a) should prove it by citing some media report and b) it's unlikely to pass at least until he signs up for a major club. Duja► 09:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
February 2008
edit
A tag has been placed on Vernes Kunovac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
The article Edin Cakovic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Never played in a fully pro league, which means the subject fails WP:NFOOTY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The file File:Vernes Kunovac.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Vernes Kunovac.jpg listed for discussion
edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vernes Kunovac.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
