Approveds

Recent edits to Scrambled eggs

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! smtchahal^(talk) 07:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Approveds. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yet again, Wikipedia is not a cookbook, so those edits have been removed. Also, you are again consistently using formatting that does not make sense and is just wedged into the article with no proper flow. I'm trying to WP:AGF here, but this is looking a lot like trolling. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Misleading edit summaries

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Scrambled eggs has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 08:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)