User talk:Anynobody/test area

1. [1]
2. [2]
3. [3]
4. [4]

I agree that under most circumstances a first offense would not be cause to indef block or ban, in this issue however there are several mitigating factors against treating the accounts in question as an editor worthy of WP:AGF.

1. This is not the first offense, it's the first time they were caught. In early April COFS was blocked and this is when I met CSI LA. T
2. The second was when the socks were caught after the second block evasion at the end of April.
3. The third is that yet another WP:SOCK, Misou, is revealed. I haven't finished researching how this account could have been supporting still more socks, at this point we really should check.
4. The requests to unblock are based partially on a misrepresentation (CSI LA saying 1000 members are being affected, that can't be true and also hides the actual number being affected (if there is more than one editor).

It's important that more community discussion be done before unblocking anyone, seriously this is a really weird situation that can not be closed without more investigation. Anynobody 22:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Anynobody, you are very good in letting this sound "caring". Cut off the nice words and there is an intention which can create rancor and could summarize to trolling. Does not build an encyclopedia, that's for sure. Stop your personal attacks on me - that's 3. above - to start with. Thank you. And yes, Anynobody, let's do an investigation! Let's find out where everybody in this place is going to. Wikipedia may not be the right place for it. Because this is an encyclopedia, not a club. Say a place and time. Misou 23:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

No personal attack was made against you, Misou. "Sockpuppet" doesn't sound like a nice word, I'll grant that, but it's the established jargon here for the way that your account relates to the others in question here. ··coelacan 06:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Misou I did care about your opinion, before it was reported that you are also operating in the same IP range as the identified socks (if you'll look at the date on your link you'll see my point). Since you mention the discussion though, why didn't you mention the "shared ip" when we were talking about the COFS/CSI LA issue here: User talk:Misou#? Re comments on...?