Reply
editYou said Halmidi inscription is not in Kannada, seriously this comment makes me laugh, do you know, hundreds hundreds of scholars,historians have studied Halmidi inscription and proved it is indeed Kannada. if you think it is not in Kannada, why don't you go to university and submit your theory, just imagine the next situation there. and regarding Charition mime, most scholars (Hultzsch, Rice,...) believed it is in Kannada, and B. A. Saletore and R.Shama Shastri proved it is Kannada. have you ever heard these names?? B. A. Saletore(well known Indian historian) and R.Shama Shastri (who first translated Kautilya Arthashastra into english) were the important scholars of India. remember you should provide high qualiy sources, in that pdf, it just mentions about P.S.Rai(shivaprasad rai) claims. he is the only scholar till now who believed it is in Tulu. and in languageofindia website, it does not clearly mentions who proved that?, wikipedia don't accept such references. In wikipedia top priority is given to Scholar/book sources. Yes, i requested Kensplanet to write history section because he has very good experience in wikipedia and written several GA's and FA's and editing wikipedia from past 3 years, more importantly he donot add false information. and finally, my sincere advice to you is stop harassing others, using abusive language is not good for you, bcoz it shows your culture, is this a way you brought up? now take some rest, return back and make some constructive edits. C21Ktalk 19:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)