Anuran
Hi
First of all, thanks for the catch - that was my mistake. I had assessed it as part of the drive to turn ??? unassessed articles [1] into assessed ones [2]. Articles were not assessed by content per se, but rather by volume as the main drive was to correctly assess for stub and start-class rather than importance, and once assessed for class the importance ??? was automatically changed to a low. The intent was that after they were all assigned a class, they would be looked at by editors and assessed for importance and content during the next stage of the drive. Unfortunately that did not happen as quickly as required, and I went through articles to assess importance on the major robotics-topics articles, this seems to be one I missed.
If you are especially interested in robots, perhaps you would consider looking the robotics project over? Wikipedia:WikiProject Robotics
It is not a fast moving or extremely active project, but we are in the process of reassessing articles and any help would be appreciated. While I can see that you have put the attention needed flag on in the SLAM talk page, often us non-expert editors have to look things up in text books and papers and fix things ourselves; If you are interested there is a whole category of robotics articles needing work that you may be perfectly suited to helping with :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 15:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Nice catch... edit
...finding the hoax at human echolocation. Thanks for reverting it! Binksternet (talk) 01:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)