July 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page IP address spoofing worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Bart133 t c @ 04:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Http://images.apple.com/macmini/images/overview hero1 20100615.png

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tahifehifa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Tanvir 16:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

User talk:ShadowReflection

edit

I'm curious: as a new user, how did you find this page? TNXMan 18:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC) I was just randomly browsing wikipedia... hold on let me think oh yeah I think I went to the signcorrectionbot or whatever, then the operator of the bot, then I saw something about a blocked user ShadowReflection... I was curious to check it out.Reply

A bit truth challenged, we are. No i know I saw someone talkin bout it and Im interested in other blocked users! AHHHHHH i clicked on it jesus what do u think im a sockpuppet of Shadow whatever or what??? AHHHHHHH
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts: User:Antapanta45. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon::==( o ) 20:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AntsmaPantsma454545 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Aww god damnit Jpgordon! your always there to solve the crime... as you can see some of my edits HAVE indeed been constructive... God i cant go by with a normal wiki account without SOMEONE knowing its me! ahh!

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    • understand what you have been blocked for,
    • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 20:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.