Anthonyjameswood

What is the source of the statement "It has been postulated that this mechanism will continually increase the human brood size until there is some form of intervention" on the "Future evolution of humans" page? The website TwinMajority.org is no longer available; was that it? Just curious; without a verifiable published source, this seems like pure speculation and should probably be removed from the article. RJCraig 10:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of XMOS

A tag has been placed on XMOS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Silicon Gorge

==Proposed deletion of Silicon Gorge==

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Silicon Gorge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no likelihood of this becoming a useful article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Silicon Gorge

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Silicon Gorge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article has not been actively edited for some time. Consists of only one sentence. No reason to beleive that any ediotr is going to expand it.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)