Anoopkohli
I dont know why bro? why you are doing all this, You want www.khukhrain.tk to take legal action against you.Dont you know that IP address can be traced and thus the locality and service providers. You have been warned even by wikipedia, but again you are on the same track. I think I should also write to the canada based khukhrain community website about your GREAT WORK. So that you should be banned from that community also. This time you have crossed all the limits
khukhrain.azeon
Stop
editI don't know if you need warnings that come with flashing lights and badges, but I was charitable in not removing your priviledge to edit Wikipedia before. Don't threaten me, it will do you no good. Got it? Because if not a ban will be coming your way, taking the socks with it as well as your ISP being notified. Okay? Thanks, bye! Keegan (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- This account has been indefinintely blocked from editing for continuing to add copyright violations. Please post {{unblock}} on this page with reasons why you feel this block is unjustified to contest the block. Keegan (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Anoopkohli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My account has been blocked for editing by Keegan without a proper investigative survey and as an apperant result of an hurried reaction to some inappropriate claims of copying from a website www.khukhrain.tk. He has not even taken pains to verify those claims and reacted in a bid to satisfy his "EGO". He could have appropriately moved out of his comfort shell and taken pains of verifying by compairing the last edits with the material on the said site. Kindly intervene.
Decline reason:
Sorry, we do not accept one-armed man arguments - you earned the block yourself, not because Keegan had a lousy day, and as such your unblock request should be about yourself, in particular your behavior. Declined. -Jeremy (v^_^v Tear him for his bad verses!) 08:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of File:MohallaSahnianWala.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:MohallaSahnianWala.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rrburke(talk) 17:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mohalalh Sethian wala.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Mohalalh Sethian wala.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim1357 talk 20:03, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:MOHALLAH KOHLIAN WALA.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:MOHALLAH KOHLIAN WALA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim1357 talk 00:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The file File:BheraEnclaveNewDelhi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Bhera Mohallas.jpg
edit
Thank you for uploading File:Bhera Mohallas.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
