Kgf chapter 2 has earned 675 crore till day 6 0lease rectify it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.32.226 (talk) 18:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing films in India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please add an updated source to support your changes. Regards
Ab207 (talk) 06:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Telugu films of 2022. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.
Please do not remove sourced BO figures without consensus. We use range when sources differ.
Ab207 (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I will keep in mind Ab207. Sorry for being naive. Will handle things better. Anish2390 (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

KGF2

edit

Hey Nayinta mone, kgf 2days box-office collection is 286cr not 420cr. I know you are are kgf fan. But this is wikipedia, here no fan things add. You added without reliable sources. I already reported you and administrators will edit kgf page. Don't edit kgf page stay away. Anish poorimone mealaal ee vazhiku Vanni pogaruth. Ne poyi kuttim kollum kalik ath aahn nink patiya Pani. 27.97.165.203 (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ae dhemnar pola, I will edit page as much as I want you stay away you fucking twerp. khankir chele chodale gaanr bhenge debo! Anish2390 (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kutha Ki BeTTA Anish

edit

Dey poorimone, ne athikam kidani korakanda. You edit as mush as you can, but I report and administrators take action against you. Your previous contribution to KGF Chapter 2 the box-office report has undone by wikipedia administrators regarding my report. You edit and administrators delete hahahah. What a game child. You are little baby you should go and play with water, Don't play with fire it will burn you. Ninta thandha yodu poyi oomban para madarchod. 49.15.216.90 (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

tor baba maa kuttar rfendi tor pora ganre maari dim chudir bhai chomchom tor bou para chudae, udgandur beta. tor ma khanki tui khankir pola tor baba hijra , ja gaanr mara lawra chyudi. black dog Anish2390 (talk) 13:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

FCUK OFF

edit

How is your wife and my children's??? Ur wyf is so freaking talented. What a nyt was that. I will pay 100 will u give her once more 49.15.216.90 (talk) 15:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

first tell me are you tamil, telugu or malayali? Anish2390 (talk) 07:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained removal of many iconic buildings like Chatterjee International etc

edit

  Hello, I'm Joy goel. I noticed that in you edits to List of tallest buildings in Kolkata, you removed a lot of important content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. To be specific with you this list has always been a list of buildings above 90 meters and a list of buildings in Kolkata is never going to be complete without the inclusion of iconic buildings like Chatterjee International Center, Panache, Ideal heights etc. Please do not remove these important buildings without reaching a consensus.Thank you. Joy goel (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I will remember thanks. Anish2390 (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Box office figures

edit

Hello, Anish2390. Please do not change BO figures without sources or remove estimates without discussion as you did to List of Telugu films of 2022. Verifiability and neutral point of view are core policies of Wikipedia. Please update the source whenever you change any information, and seek consensus at the article talk page if you want to remove any reliably sourced content. Thanks and regards. Diffs:[1], [2], [3], [4] -- Ab207 (talk) 04:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Tamil films of 2022, you may be blocked from editing. Panda619 (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Give me facts as to what I did wrong. I have always provided proof. Anish2390 (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Will handle things better Panda619. Sorry for naivety. Anish2390 (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Telugu films of 2022.
Don't change anything without sources. The WP:BURDEN is on you to add new sources for your claims.
Ab207 (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes will stop from now. Anish2390 (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of Tamil films of 2022. Panda619 (talk) 04:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes will stop from now. Anish2390 (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can you give me a detailed reason as to which contribution/s led to my account block? Anish2390 (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Surely you already know which contributions led to your account block. Look at all of the editors who came to your talk page to ask you to stop. Look at how many of your edits are reverted by other editors. If you continue making these types of edits after your block expires, your account will be blocked indefinitely. For the most part, you are either removing sources from articles without explanation, or you are changing sourced information in articles without explanation and without providing an alternate source. Some examples from just the last few days: [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]
Additionally, your remark on this page above referring to another editor as a fucking twerp is a clear violation of WP:CIVIL. You'd do well to read that policy in full. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment. You need to work with your fellow editors, not against them. Creating messes that other editors need to spend their time cleaning up is one of the quickest ways to get blocked here. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hey man, did you realize that he was abusing me in his native language. I just acted in self defense. Are you selectively blind or are you siding with him coz he is your friend? Anish2390 (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think I will take this up with the higher authorities coz this is clearly partiality shown. Casteism is involved. Anish2390 (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't speak whatever language that is, and Google Translate doesn't even seem to be able to recognize what language that is. You can take it up with whoever you want. But again, I can guarantee that if you continue the same behavior after the block expires, you'll be blocked indefinitely. If you have any questions about how sourcing works or if any of the rules aren't clear, feel free to ask. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 01:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
No use asking you. I don't care what you think frankly, you are a tamil guy im sure of that. And a fan of vijay as well. You are biased from the get go. Anyways, you don't get paid for this. So, I will stop editing this page, I'm a co-editor for a lot of pages, No one has had a problem yet, there have been appreciations as a matter of fact. But you wouldn't know that ofcourse, I understand you are a grumpy old man who hides behind a false name. A nobody actually. Cheers with whatever you lead as a life. Anish2390 (talk) 08:13, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry ScottyWong. Went a bit overboard. Sorry for the naivety. Won't happen again. Anish2390 (talk) 09:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 22:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anish2390 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The pages which have been mentioned, I will stop permanently from editing, but I have useful contributions to a lot of other pages, can the timeline be preponed to a month?. Anish2390 (talk) 07:58, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This does not address the stated reason for the block, personal attacks/harassment. Putting an end date on the block does not show us that you understand the reason for it. The block will be removed once you do that. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anish2390 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand the allegations against me. I will refrain from using any personal attacks/harassment towards anyone, be it an admin or someone who's new. Disruptive editing/editing of any sort aforementioned will also stop on said pages. Anish2390 (talk) 09:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your actions here demonstrate you haven't the slightest intention of refraining from personal attacks. WP:SO is probably your best bet here, which requires six months with zero edits. At that point, you'll need to explain what changes you've made in your life so we can be convinced you'll refrain from personal attacks if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 10:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.