Speedy deletion of Starfish Television Network

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Starfish Television Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paste (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent additions to U2 article

edit

Hi Andy, thanks for your addition to the U2 Live at Red Rocks article. Unfortunately, I had to revert your edits since you didn't provide a citation. I know you said you worked on the film yourself, but that information is original research unless you can provide a reference otherwise. If you have any documented information that can be added to the article, please let me know. Thanks. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi D-O-L, That is unfortunate. Video West ceased to exist as a company in 2002, so there's little that I could do to substantiate what I wrote. There are at least two other former Video West employees who were with me there at the time who could substantiate it, but I guess unless I can point to a URL, or book, I'm done. That's sad, as a video engineer I find it interesting to know what equipment was used. Thanks. Andycarleton (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC) P.S. if someone would like to interview me about the behind the scenes stuff, I can give you more info about what Bono was doing while it rained before the concert. Then maybe I'd have an article to point to. :)Reply

You could try contacting a U2 fansite like atu2.com and if they do an interview with you and publish it, then we could use that information to cite the article. Otherwise, any information you add would just be original research, which isn't allowed here. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
It's just not worth the effort to me at this point.
Having been interviewed a couple of times before I know that reporters change things to "improve" the story. And reporters don't always have a good grasp of what might be important about their subject. I showed the article to two other gentlemen who were there with me. One still has the "U2 at Red Rocks Associates" crew t-shirt that was given out that day, and the other has a bottle of gin that Gavin gave him, to thank us for what Video West had done that day... sorry, "original research" ;). They agree that there are other minor inaccuracies in the story, but since an eyewitness isn't allowed to correct them... oh well!
I've now learned to take Wikipedia articles with the same grain of salt I take newspaper reports. (I get that these are Wikipedia's rules and not yours.) Have a nice life! :) (Pet Peeve: When you videotape something shot with video cameras it's not called "filming", it's called "taping".) Andycarleton (talk) 13:31, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply