Nonsense of Fidando

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fidando, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fidando provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fidando, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gamers Rage

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gamers Rage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gamers Rage. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008

edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Callum Beattie, you will be blocked from editing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
Congratulations! Your request to be blocked has been granted by FisherQueen! You will be blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for creating inappropriate pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.