Andrej N. B.

Austrians

Please disucss and don't continue to revert :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Already have. Andrej N. B. (talk) 22:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

There is a discussion on the talk page about the inclusion or otherwise of Hitler in the info box but no conclusion that he should be excluded. Do not misrepresent this. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

The "reason for the revision", I'm guessing, is that you made an edit after some questionable ones, without leaving an edit summary, leading an editor to question the latest one. In it you removed the fact that Hitler is Austrian born. This fact is mentioned above in the article, so this removal could be justified - but you did not leave an explanation of this. Please leave edit summaries; accurate ones. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

You´re right - the first revision was not correct. I didn´t notice the sourced changes. Assumed vandalism too fast. Andrej N. B. (talk) 22:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

You are POV pushing. I have engaged on both your talk page and the article talk page. Please self-revert. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Austrians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

It would be a lot easier if we could just discuss on the talk page of the article. Andrej N. B. (talk) 23:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

As you are well aware, I have discussed this on your talk page and the article page. You are warring. Please self-revert. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

First Hitlers picture was put into the article with the argument, that Mozart wasnt really an Austrian either. That argument is correct. Neither Mozart nor Hitler are good examples for famous Austrians. That is also what I said on the talk page. So now you are saying Hitler is a good choice. Tell me why and source it. Andrej N. B. (talk) 23:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

My comments are more in regard to your unexplained edits, your misrepresentation of the talk page discussion and your warring. Please self-revert. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok, and in what case my change from Hitler to Lorenz woud be justified? Andrej N. B. (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand the question and it does not address your warring and disruptive style of editing, which I have now reported. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Austrians, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)