Andelum

one and only warning re Talk:A Rape on Campus

If you mention her last name anywhere on Wikipedia again without getting a firm consensus first that it should be included, you will be blocked. You can have the discussion without using the last name. -- GB fan 10:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Isn't it just amazing how nearly everybody rushes to defend all women as much as they can, regardless of how bad they are? I don't care about your threats, even if carried out they would be of no consequence whatsoever. Her real name is already linked to the wikipedia page on the first page of Google anyway. Would there be ANY movement on wikipedia to protect the name of a suspected rapist, while his guilt was not proven yet? NEVER. Andelum (talk) 10:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

I am not defending her. You are on a private website and the policies and consensus say her last name should not be mentioned. If you think that consensus is wrong you are free to discuss it without actually mentioning her last name. If you can gain consensus then you can mention her last name. I don't care either way. -- GB fan 12:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your initial reaction would suggest otherwise. It wasn't even on the main page anyway, but on the talk page. Andelum (talk) 12:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

What reaction, telling you that if you continue to do something that violates consensus here, you will be blocked. That is not a defense of her, it is a defense of Wikipedia's rules and consensus. The location does not make any difference, when the consensus that saying something is a WP:BLP violation, it is a violation anywhere on Wikipedia. -- GB fan 12:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)