post your meaningless bot notices here please

January 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Capitalize, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Neverquick (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sakura Kusakabe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2008

edit

IHello. I've reverted your edits to Ctrl+Alt+Del. The criticism is neither notable, nor properly sourced (blogs and personal websites are not proper wiki sources).--Thrindel (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not notable? It's by Josh Lesnick, a veteran comic artist. Obviously it's on his blog, that takes the value of it? --AnY FOUR! (talk) 06:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnY FOUR! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock, the other sockpuppets are from two years ago, I haven't done anything wrong other than admitting I had sockpuppets once.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppets must request unblock through their original account. That would be AnYoNe! (talk · contribs) here. —  Sandstein  16:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnY FOUR! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

But I don't want to use my original account, I want another account with another name and I can't do that if I am IP blocked.

Decline reason:

Too bad. You have to use the original account. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Euromilhões listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Euromilhões. Since you had some involvement with the Euromilhões redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 16:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Fightan gaems" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fightan gaems. Since you had some involvement with the Fightan gaems redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply