Ameshoff

Airlink incident

I have requested help from experienced editors at Wikiproject Airlines to resolve our disagreement about the inclusion or exclusion of the Airlink incident. Please seeWikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines#Minimum criteria for including incidents.2Faccidents. I hope we can settle this satisfactorily. Roger (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you.

Another editor has come along and removed two incident paragraphs - the editor cited Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airlines)#Incidents and accidents as their reason for removing the paragraphs. Roger (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.--Jetstreamer (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Missing edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Airlink does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!--Jetstreamer (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ameshoff. You have new messages at Dodger67's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Roger (talk) 12:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Airlink may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• rollout on the wet runway surface. Several non-compliance procedures were not followed.<ref>[http://www.baaa-acro.com/2009/archives/crash-of-an-embraer-erj-135-in-george/</ref> Airlink's

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)