Alphaaussie

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Premier (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alphaaussie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't violated any wikipedia rules I am aware of in the short time I have been involved. Is that a persuasive enough reason? What is the meaning of this?

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block: sockpuppetry. — Sandstein 07:04, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alphaaussie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll address it this time. I deny it totally. Perhaps it falls to you to produce your evidence?

Decline reason:

This is not a court and evidence is not required. Based on your contributions, I have no grounds to doubt the blocking administrator's judgment. — Sandstein 11:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alphaaussie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deny the allegations totally. Can somebody explain to me how to appeal to the arbitration committee? I want to note one thing. The book in question Elizabeth Kwan's "Flag and Nation". My name was mentioned in that title. And I bet the editor who banned me, I don't think his name was mentioned in it. Surely no one is no expert on the level of support for the existing Australian flag than me? I field approximately 10 requests for media interviews per year as an expert in this field. This is outrageous!

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Appealing_a_block#Appeal_to_the_Arbitration_Committee is what you're looking for. — Metros (talk) 03:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic