I have added a brief comment to Talk:Agility Logistics explaining my reasoning. Ryanjunk 20:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I can help you on the page if you like, what specifically do you have questions about? A good start on reducing the first-person and NPOV; the section on the three divisions still seems a bit advertising. There are also a lot of red links (wikilinks that don't point to existing articles) which looks ugly. If there is some objective source for the data on employment, revenue and so on, it would be good to cite that. Feel free to insert the information you mentioned on the talk page about the awards, so long as you also put references. I don't really know much about this industry but this does seem to be a large organization, so it is probably notable enough to merit an article if we can get it cleaned up properly. Ryanjunk 21:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Issues with Agility Logistics website has been resolved Allibreton

Image tagging for Image:Agility logo.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Agility logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

This issue has been resolved Allibreton