Peer Review, due April 7:
Hi AliAsghar! Your lead section flowed well and did not go into too much detail about the language. Its briefness gives the reader a glimpse of what your main article will be about. Good job with that! I only noticed a few grammatical errors:
In the second sentence you write " It's grammar ... " This is minor, but you should delete the apostrophe in it's. The possessive form of its is without the apostrophe.
Also, in your third sentence, "Arabic speakers today would be find it difficult..." 'be' should be omitted from this sentence.
Other than your minor grammatical errors, your lead section seems like a good start to your main article. Good luck with the project!
-Megan Collins
Peer review
Hi,
Your introduction looks good, and you have plenty of references. I would include a little bit more information at the end of the introduction re: where exactly the language is spoken. In addition, it would be helpful to cite (in-text) some of the information, so that a reader can click on that citation link and see the sources. I'm not sure how in depth you would like your lead section to be, but maybe after the last sentence you could include a few of those dialect's names, and add an in-text citation. If you feel that would make your lead in too long, maybe later on you can have a section devoted to those various dialects of the language. I agree with the editor above that "Arabic speakers today would find it difficult..." should be omitted, unless you can find a relevant source to substantiate this claim. One more little thing, I linked certain words, such as "Arabic", so the reader can easily get to relevant subjects through your page.
editor: Lydia Chenoweth
Peer Review
editHi! I found the same mistakes that some of the editors stated above such as the extra word added to the sentence, "Arabic speakers today would (be) find it difficult," but there is one other thing that stood out to me about your page. Make sure that your sources are in alphabetical order when making your final Wikipedia page. This is a minor mistake that can easily be fixed, but it is very important that this is done. Your sources look very credible, and your lead section has very nice structure besides the minor grammatical errors.
- Leah Chiorello