AitMazigh

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – 2804:F14:8085:6201:60D0:5E55:B29D:8875 (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Moroccanoil. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Bbb23 (talk) 20:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Are you a administrator? AitMazigh (talk) 20:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23: apparently, your warning wasn't enough of a deterrent. M.Bitton (talk) 20:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from commenting here I have no idea who you are. AitMazigh (talk) 21:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

IP address data

I was going to reply to your comment[1] at the ANI noticeboard, but as it's a big off topic I thought I would put it here. IP addresses aren't as anonymous as people think. Each one has WHOIS information attached to it, such as this for the reported IP. So knowledge that the IP 'cable internet customer' is not anything untoward.
To answer your comment above, Bbb23 is an admin, so I would listen to what they say. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 21:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

fair enough. AitMazigh (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

I’ve literally made zero edits this is literal slander show me one instance of making an edit. AitMazigh (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AitMazigh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have made no edits to a page let alone disruptive edits can a admin clarify what disruptive edit I made.

Decline reason:

Special:Contributions/AitMazigh shows numerous edits. That's not getting in to your abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AitMazigh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not sure how to respond to the previous unblock request so I’m making another request, can you clarify what constitutes an edit is it a page edit or are replies edits as well secondly I only had one other account which I forgot the password to so I made this account can you elaborate on what you mean by abuse is it considered abuse to make a new account if you forgot the password and had no email set on your previous account?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your first edit was "ban this fool", "who does this imbecile think he’s fooling". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AitMazigh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize for resulting to calling that individual a fool and I take that statement back nonetheless the individual in question was deleting and altering sources on the moroccanoil page which was inconsistent with Wikipedia rules as other users pointed out. I’m a new editor still unfamiliar with the nuances of these rules and will not insult any other user if unblocked. AitMazigh (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You shouldn't need to know any rules to know that personal attacks and insults are not permitted, that's just basic courtesy. In any event, setting that aside, I'm concerned about your your accusation of bad faith against another user for which you did not provide any evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Please see WP:AGF. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you ever edited Wikipedia under any other username or identity? (Answering "yes" to this does not necessarily mean you have to stay blocked.) City of Silver 02:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Edited a Wikipedia page, no. I did create a topic in the talk section under the ibnmazigh account which I no longer have access to as I forgot the password and I never attached a email to that account so I have no way of recovering that account hence why I made a new account. AitMazigh (talk) 02:22, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Is this the first time you've admitted to using more than one account here? City of Silver 02:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

No one has asked if I used more than one account so presumably the answer would be yes. AitMazigh (talk) 02:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Additional statement I wanted to add this ip user 69.127.244.66 who made actual page edits which were racist and insulted several users in the talk tab was given a 72 hour block. In my case I made no page edit I did call someone a fool which I apologize for but a indefinite block is ludicrous for a first time offender who is obviously not acting in a disrupting demeanor other than the insult which I regret I added to the discussion which seemingly has been solved in my favor. AitMazigh (talk) 16:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)