Ag715
Greetings edit
Hi Annalisa. Thanks for posting on my talk page. One detail: when you post on the talk page click on the "new section" tab to create a new section at the bottom of the page. When I logged in I was told I had a new message, but I couldn't find it b/c I was looking at the bottom of the page.--Theredproject (talk) 02:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Simon de Colines edit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_de_Colines Ag715 (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Ludwig Hohlwein edit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Hohlwein Ag715 (talk) 15:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013 edit
Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Simon de Colines because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya (Hello!) 15:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ag715, you needed to make those edits to the talk page for Simon de Colines--Theredproject (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Plan of attack edit
The two articles I will be choosing to look into further detail on would be:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Grandjean and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Hohlwein.
I think both of these articles need lots of work and more detail in them. My plan: researching these individuals through books and articles. I need to get more information of their background and biographical details about them personally. Also, I would like to look at their historical background and find out what made them get into their career. Educatio and work definitely have to be added in too.
- Hi Ag715, I think you should work on Ludwig Hohlwein as several other students have expressed an interest in Grandjean, and have presented a more concrete plan of attack backed up with some research. What sources have you found for Hohlwein?--Theredproject (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Ag715, you need to be more careful with your edits. You need to understand the difference between the article and talk pages. All commentary goes on the talk page. I just reverted your edits, as they were to the article page, when they should have been to the talk page. Your last edits were reverted also. Did you do the student editor training? I recommend you review that training.--Theredproject (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
Hello Annalisa,
Nice start on your Wiki for Ludwig Hohlwein. I hope you don't mind that I added categories to add organization to the page. Having the different sections, not only adds organization but creates a flow to help make the points clearer and makes the wiki an easier source of research to navigate. I love that you have inputed a gallery, nice touch. Best of luck, can't wait to see the finished product.
peer review edit
Hi Ag715!
Your article sounds good so far but it definitely needs to be expanded. I'm not sure if you did your work in a separate document then will add at the end. I would strongly recommend adding citations since there's only one in the article. If you're able to find info on his personal life, I would also recommend adding that section to make the article more interesting. I like the gallery as well. Good luck!