April 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sexual surrogate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not blank pages, as you did to Abstinence-only sex education with this edit, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Laber□T 13:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to LGBT in Islam with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Laber□T 13:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Laber□T 13:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please make personal edits to your user page, not to your talk page. This talk page serves as a record of warnings related to misuses of Wikipedia. Blanking one's own talk page may be considered vandalism by some. 192.249.47.205 (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  In case my earlier comment was unclear, please refer to this page: [Page Guidelines: Editing Comments] You should not delete or edit comments that are not your own. 192.249.47.205 (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply