Still in the works

October 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sub-Saharan Africa has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tresiden (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Africabalance. You have new messages at Tresiden's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks

edit

Thanks for stopping by my page and leaving a note. I can't say I've left Wikipedia, because I never really joined. This is a place I stopped by to write about what I know, to try to address the lies and virulent racism of the website.

These are things I simply don't bother to do anymore. Such activity is pointless. I don't even stop by to see what's happening with this or that article. I've made no grand announcement re my "departure," the way so many do. (Who really gives a sh*t? lol) I'm no more or less committed to the project than I ever was.

Simply put, this website just ... bores me.

I wish you well. deeceevoice (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Regancy42 (talk) 04:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you look at this edit, you will see that you've removed a significant amount of information. I'm assuming that it wasn't intentional, I should've used the AGF option, sorry.-Regancy42 (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply