Addere

		The Original Barnstar
		message 82.2.139.211 22:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice work on those "lists of works"!

Kirby Cundiff

I suspect that you probably already know this but Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Conflicts does say in cases like this not to restore the tag. You may want to send the article to an AfD. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

In this case yse. From the Prod page "...except if the removal was clearly not an objection to deletion (such as blanking the entire article...". Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment moved from my user page

• Categorise Tom Winsor under Scottish lawyers as well as British lawyers pls. Unsigned comment from Michael Richardson. Addere 22:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey, you didn't get the standard welcome message but I suspect you don't need it as I think you have been here a while longer than it would seem

Welcome!

Hello, Addere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Assistance?

Hi, I noticed that your tags requesting proper citation, cleanup, and scrutiny of the POV on the Larry Pinkney article were removed by editor 209.244.42.6, who likewise removed my own NPOV dispute tags on the same article, among other things (like researching me to find out my real name, college, hometown, etc. and posting it on the discussion page in an attempt to discredit my tags and talk-page comments). You might find the discussion page interesting...

I am requesting Arbitration, as editor 209.244.42.6 has refused to consider mediation, but I would really appreciate the informal assistance of an experienced Wikipedian. Would you be willing to take another look at the discussion page and/or history for the Larry Pinkney article? Even if you don't have the time or interest to get involved in the arbitration, any advice would be most welcome.

Thank you,

DevinMcGevin 08:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Play for Blood

Just to let you know whats going on. I deleted this yesterday as I agreed with the PROD. However, I got this which is a reasonable request as per WP:PROD so I have restored the article. It means that it will require an AfD. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't delete!!!

Please don't delete my article! Jason Moore needs an article! I don't think there is any possible way of getting permission. Hold on, don't delete it, for I will get some permission! A.P. 21:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC) I did leave one. Are you the one trying to delete it? I checked the history, and I think your the one who controls the Android mouse bots, am I right? I did E-mail BBC and am awaiting a response. I though the reason you were going to delete it was for the fact that I had no indication of me having permission. Oh well. I redone it, if you could look at it. I did the best I can. It took so long because I accidentally signed out while edditing (I friggin' hate when that happens!!!) so I redone it, better that my original edit. A.P. 22:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Thank you very much!!! A.P. 11:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Herbert Greenhough Smith

Why trim the genealogical information that explains why he used the double surname ?

RGCorris 17:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Pella Community Day Care Center

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Pella Community Day Care Center, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Longhair\^talk 15:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Addere. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)