January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm The Mirror Cracked. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ella Balinska without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ella Balinska, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ella Balinska, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 09:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ella Balinska, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 17:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Ella Balinska Vanity Fair 2020.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Ella Balinska Vanity Fair 2020.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Actionfan365. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 03:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Actionfan365, what is your relationship to DaneNinty? GeneralNotability (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi GeneralNotability. It seems the user has become active again but has yet to disclose any COI. KyleJoantalk 06:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit
 

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
GeneralNotability (talk) 12:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply