Acroterionn

February 2015

Hello, I'm Lerdthenerd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. Lerdthenerd wiki defender 16:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask was changed by Acroterionn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897194 on 2015-02-21T16:48:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess was changed by Acroterionn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956013 on 2015-02-21T16:50:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Delta Air Lines Flight 191. Flyer22 (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John Daker, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lerdthenerd wiki defender 16:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jac16888 ^Talk 16:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)