May 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm ArglebargleIV. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Ed Miliband with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ArglebargleIV (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

False edit summaries

edit

Consider this a final warning - if you make one more edit with an entirely false and intentionally misleading edit summary as you have done here [1][2], I will report the matter, and call for you to be blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Looking into this further, I note that almost all your 'contributions' consist of removing the honorific 'The Right Honourable' from biographies of individuals to which it applies (see List of current members of the British Privy Council, and the sources cited for individuals named therein), and adding it to individuals to whom it does not apply. Frankly, I can see no reason to consider this as anything other than vandalism. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Saleem Dhorat

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Saleem Dhorat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive edits on Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais. The issue us explained on the talk page. If you can add sources per Wikipedia policies, please do so. Continued blanking or reversions will be treated as an indication you are not here to edit appropriately and protective measures may be taken, which may include a revocation of your edit privileges. -- Avi (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply