March 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ARIZONAUSA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The person who requested a block is interfering with a Federal Election, most likely because that person wants someone else to win. I am a candidate in this election. Please unblock immediately.

Decline reason:

You are interfering with a Wikipedia article by spamming information about your efforts to qualify as a US Senate candidate and casting unfounded aspersions on other users. You are clearly not here to build this encyclopedia, so the block is valid. As such, I am declining your request. If you have valid contributions to make to this encyclopedia that are unrelated to your conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ARIZONAUSA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The blocked post is clearly Not spam and it is building an encyclopedia since this election is ongoing and the content is directly related. The blocked post contains lifesaving information, therefore blocking it will kill people. The blocked post is the epitome of building an encyclopedia. Blocking this post is Interfering with a Federal Election. Please Unblock immediately.

Decline reason:

Declined as per 331dot's comments and my comments, below. Yamla (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should use social media to tell what you feel are lifesaving procedures, as well as to promote your candidacy for office. You encourage people to sign your petition to qualify as a US Senate candidate. That's not what Wikipedia is for. 331dot (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Knock it off, ARIZONAUSA. Your contributions were a clear violation of WP:COI and WP:SPAM and were totally inappropriate even without that. If you truly don't see that your contributions were inappropriate, this is the end of the line for you. Do not request another unblock. However, if you can clearly explain why your edits were inappropriate and explain how future edits would be totally different if unblocked, you are free to request another unblock review. I want to be clear, though, if you continue wasting our time, you will lose access to this talk page. Read WP:GAB before making your next request. --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ARIZONAUSA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why would anyone block my coronavirus breakthrough? It is a very important message to post. My petition is part of the encyclopedia. I have no social media presence to share livesaving information. Until I am on TV and advertise my social media during the Primary, I will have no social media presence. Blocking this post is Interfering with a Federal Election. I am not wasting anyone's time. Blocking my post is wasting everyone's time. The Secretary of State's Office told me to collect signatures online because many businesses where I was collecting written signatures are closed due to the virus. Show respect to my effort and Unblock my account.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It does not exist to facilitate your election campaign. PhilKnight (talk) 14:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you aren't listening to us, I am removing your access to this page. If your request is declined, that will leave you with WP:UTRS to make further appeals. You should go and establish a social media presence now to do whatever campaign related work you need to do, you won't be allowed to do it on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This user evaded their block using User:USA123AZ. 331dot (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply