A777289s
I reverted your removal of the controversy section. The content is sourced to reliable media outlets. If you think that it should not be included I suggest that you make an argument on the article talk page. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 06:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please do not remove the section again without first discussing the matter at the article's talk page. Wham2001 (talk) 11:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at St Kevin's College, Melbourne, you may be blocked from editing. Stop blanking this. Discuss it on the article's tlak page if you wish, but this is extensively sourced to what appear to be reliable sources. I suggest that you read WP:BRD and WP:EW. And that was certainly not a minor edit. Meters (talk) 03:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)