June 2022

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sergio Francisco. Either you stop your nonsensical removal of a completely correct and valid template, or I'll report you. BRDude70 (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:10alatham per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/10alatham. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A13x h latham (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I made legitimate edits without a problem, I created two pages about football managers and as soon as I created them I got blocked. I made them and my edits in good faith then other users jump on my back and get me blocked when I’ve done nothing wrong whatsoever. All I’ve done is make meaningful and valid edits to help improve various pages as a whole, and I am not at all connected to the other sockpuppet accounts as none of them are me, they are someone else posing as me from other IP addresses. A13x h latham (talk) 09:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You're kidding, right? Do you think we are stupid? I cannot check but I'm sure the other accounts use different IP addresses, that doesn't mean much. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think you're very stupid indeed! I've seen the list of accounts you think are sockpuppets of me and at least three of them are not me, This is a bullying campaign against me when all I've done is make meaningful edits and created pages of people who have managed in professional leagues then they get taken down because you think I am a sockpuppet and I'm not whatsoever! I have done nothing wrong whatsoever and deep down you know that! A13x h latham (talk) 09:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Then you should make another request to attempt to convince a more gullible admin than I- which I don't think exists. Most sockpuppets deny being one, since that is the whole point. You'll have to do better. 331dot (talk) 10:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am telling the truth, I am in no way shape or form a sockpuppet! This is plain bullying and I am not happy about it! You've set out to target me for no reason whatsoever and that is justly unfair on so many levels! It's quite clear you 331dot have vendetta against me and this has to stop! I made edits without vandalising pages etc etc and you block me for doing so! If that's worthy of blocking someone then it's NOT justified at all and is quite frankly cyberbullying. A13x h latham (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply