99.126.204.164

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, although if you wish to acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages, and customize the appearance and behavior of the website
• Rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed
• Utililize a vast array of editing tools

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~). Happy editing!

Guillaume2303 (talk) 19:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Jean Grey

Check the Jean Grey article.96.238.36.171 (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

The Magister

Thanks for cleaning up those clumsy citations of mine in The Magister. That was a nice trick with the {{rp}} template—I'll remember that for next time. Regards. Braincricket (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Glad to be of help! 99.126.204.164 (talk) 06:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 07:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Elektra

Hello, and thank you for editing the Elektra article p. You are absolutely right in saying that "publication history sections should be encouraged, not suppressed ». However I had to revert your edit as long as it had ALSO reverted a few other changes which I had made in the same version, I think, for the good. In the current version, the article has slightly redundant lead and Histroy of Publication sections (but 1981 and Creation by Miller SHOULD be in the Lead section, we do agree on that, I suppose). That is not a real problem for the moment. As for the potential expansion of the maintained section, people who wish to expand it would perhaps have to use data from the Bibliography and that would mean substantial changes. This is not a problem either. With the best, --speak to Doctor Strange 03:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

PS. I did not mention it, sorry, but needless say that although I reverted your edit I maintained the History of Publication section like you said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docteur Strange (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

]]^[Talk] 02:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jim Nelson (artist) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jim Nelson (artist) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://jimnelsonart.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:29, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to New Tales: The Land Reborn, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 18:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Chasme do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Chasme was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://d20npcs.wikia.com/wiki/D&D_Named_Demon_Project#Chasme) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

D&D articles

Please refrain from restoring Dungeons and Dragons monster articles that had previously been turned into redirects. There are reasons these articles were redirected, mainly because they failed the notability guideline. You restored the articles without adding any independent source that would establish notability, which is why I have turned all the articles back to redirects. In some cases like Glasya, you have even violated an AfD consensus to merge, so if such a disruptive behavior continues you could be blocked. If you wish to continue working on D&D articles, please be sure to discuss, provide appropriate independent secondary sources (other RPGs are primary sources and can't establish notability) and reach consensus before reverting any redirect. Thank you.Folken de Fanel (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

If you're going to stalk me and redirect any D&D monster articles I edit, then I won't be editing any of them. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 12:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not "stalking" you, I'm merely restoring redirects that should never have been touched. Whether they are your responsibility or another IP's (the latter, in most cases) doesn't change the fact that your edits made it easy to identify these problematic articles, and following them is encouraged for maintenance work. You're free to edit D&D articles, but I'm merely making you aware that these edits should follow policies, and in the case of Glasya, restoring content that was redirected after an AfD without adding independent content, is not within those policies.Folken de Fanel (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Well, since you admit that you are following my edits, then I will tell you that you are going to be seeing far fewer edits from me which you will find worth following, especially when something as seemingly innocuous as this gets you to target an article. I won't allow you to use me to make it easy to further your goals, so I will avoid editing articles which I think you would be likely to want to redirect. While policy does allow you to track other users' edits for administrative purposes, and you are well within your rights to do so, policy also urges you to do so carefully "to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight"; being forced to avoid articles on which I would seek to make maintenance edits, revert vandalism, or correct poor edits made by other users just to avoid your attention does approach "disruption to [my] own enjoyment of editing". While it seems on the surface to be a nice gesture that you've granted me permission to do so, if I have to worry about what you may redirect or nominate for deletion simply because I have edited it, I will only truly be "free to edit D&D articles" when I am no longer under your microscope. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 02:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

You can talk, but unfortunately for you, you can't establish that I would "cause you distress" (?) or do it "out of revenge for a perceived slight" (?). I certainly can't see any distress you would feel since you can contribute to whatever you want. That articles get redirected can't cause you distress since you don't own them and that it is part of regular WP editing. Too bad for you if you're getting too personal with D&D articles, but if you work on non-notable articles, probability that they get redirected or deleted is indeed high. I think you give yourself too much importance, articles don't get redirected because you work on them but because they are non-notable and you just happened to work on them. I'm sorry but your "enjoyment of editing" doesn't superceed the enforcement of WP policies, I don't see any reason why it would be forbdidden to redirect articles just because you worked on them.
I also remind you that my orginal message here referred to your violations of AfD consensuses in order for you to "enjoy editing", so you shouldn't be so confrontational about it.Folken de Fanel (talk) 09:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for taking your time to make my day! You've been really sweet. :) 99.126.204.164 (talk) 11:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Madame Masque, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry about that - an edit summary would have made my intentions clearer. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mandarin (comics). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Now you're just getting silly. I can't add the words "the episode" to an article without it being considered vandalism? 99.126.204.164 (talk) 11:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Snyad

The article Snyad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

---