October 2007 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Creationism, you will be blocked from editing. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 21:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Creationism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 21:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I've blocked you for 8 hours for repeated reversion in violation of the three revert rule discussed above. When you return, please try to make an effort to discuss your proposed changes rather than just make them unilaterally. JoshuaZ 21:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Intelligent design, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wisdom89 01:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/97.82.225.246 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wisdom89 01:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply