February 2018

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Savior (Iggy Azalea song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
When you are reverted, discuss it on the talk page. Don't keep restoring your changes, no matter how right you think you are. Ss112 17:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Idolator

edit

Additionally, if you have a concern about Idolator being a reliable source, take it to WP:RSN. Don't mention at articles "it's hardly reliable" to help prove your point. It's recognised as a reliable source, whether you like it or not. You also don't seem like you actually speak as if you're from Lisbon, which is where your IP geolocates to. Are you a long-term disruptive editor who has been blocked before, or are you a new editor who actually lives in Portugal? Ss112 17:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure how to work around this talk page among other things in Wikipedia besides basic edits so sorry about the formatting on this reply. Idolator isn't really reliable because sometimes they just post stuff that's circulating on social media whether it's true or not. I'm also unsure why you're saying I don't speak as if I'm from Lisbon, what's that supposed to mean? All I was trying to point out is that every virtual store does not list Dr. Luke as a producer and that just because one blog implied it while summing up why an artist was clarifying something doesn't make it a fact, not to mention how Iggy herself has specified his contributions to the song and they were not producing related. A fan edited a screenshot and the Genius page making it circulate on twitter, however that hardly means it's true so I don't know why you're keeping his name as a producer when it's literally nowhere else.

Idolator is still accepted as a source, regardless of its status as a blog or not. Not that I think Idolator did in this instance, but Billboard for instance has circulated stories from credits originating on Genius.com before (about Culture II by Migos), and nobody questions their status as a reliable source. It happens with all types of reporting. And yes, virtual stores no longer list Dr. Luke because of what Idolator says—after Iggy talked about it, his credit was removed. Perhaps due to the controversy and wanting to disassociate the song from him. Idolator claims Tidal listed Dr. Luke for a time, and Tidal's credits are not editable and not subject to what fans choose to screenshot on Twitter, gossip about on Genius or the like. I didn't add the content to the page nor put his name there in the first place; I'm simply reverting editors who are disregarding the hidden note. Ss112 18:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Iggy Azalea discography, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ss112 01:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply