DISAGREE WITH MOVE. More to the point, I am puzzled by the suggestion of the categorization of Metaphysics. Might one assume that Wikipedia intends to change their definition of Metaphysics? Frankly, I think a lot of people are threatened by the notion that consciousness creates reality although Lanza's book pretty much lays it out in scientific terms. His position is not a philosophical one. It is one informed by direct experience and backed by science. Metaphysics may be the philosophy of Being but Biocentrism posits the origin of being. I read the book some time ago and have mulled over it since. I also had the opportunity to hear Dr. Lanza speak and take a number of follow-up questions. I am neither scientist nor philosopher. But I ask - if Biocentrism is NOT a theory of everything then what exactly does it leave out; what does it not explain? What is NOT scientifically explained by Biocentrism? Marmvr (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |