I am afraid you need to leave all investigation information regarding an abuse report on the abuse report page. I see you tried to remove information from the case. All information is acceptable and no one other than an investigator may remove irrelevant information. If you need to have information removed that you feel is irrelevant, please contact me or another abuse response investigator. Thank you.  JoeGazz  ▲  20:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. m.o.p 22:13, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.5.207.133 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry for the ongoing vandalism. I have a bit more wisdom and I'll edit Wikipedia in a more mature manner.--92.5.207.133 (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As a blocked user, you aren't permitted to edit Wikipedia- not even by logging out from your User:Samlaptop85213 account. It is you, the person, who is blocked from editing. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.