92.28.107.71

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.28.107.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Being called a sock for no apparent reason? "Looks like them. Blocked for a week. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)"- Reviewing this page, it that anyone who gets reported there is banned? Doesn't seem fair, especially since the banned side is never questioned? [1] Looking at this page it seems there is always the same admins involved? Possible conflict of interest on banning admins part? 92.28.107.71 (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Hi, so if you look at the banning reason, it says: 02:07, 1 March 2021 GeneralNotability talk contribs blocked 92.28.107.71 talk with an expiration time of 1 week (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cypriot Chauvinist), I don't see how I didn't address it, I understand what I'm blocked for, what I'm saying is I'm not it, I don't see how I can change that, that isn't a behavioral issue, that's accusing me of being someone else, If you look there you see that a lot of people have been banned and are also being reported by the same user and being usually blocked by the same admins, this seems more to be targeted attacks as opposed to anything, if you see , you'll see there is 1 culprit in particular (FDW777) and the admin, User:GeneralNotability seems to just ban without doing any proper investigation into the subject, so I'm not sure what you want me to address here, the evidence is all there.

Edit: Unless you're seeing another reason, in which case please tell me it, I'm seeing the sockpuppet thing.

---